STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
A11-0276
Marvin Pirila,
Petitioner,
Gail Francette,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Duane Grace,
Respondent,
John Gulland, et al.,
Respondents.
O R D E R
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Marvin Pirila for further review
be, and the same is, denied.
Dated: October 26, 2011
BY THE COURT:
/s/
Lorie S. Gildea
Chief Justice
This is the simplistic response you get after incurring trespassing, numerous statutory violations and rules, and the Fourth Amendment. You are witnessing one of the biggest problems with America, legislation from the bench. They decide what they will review based on their desires and not that of the law they are paid to enforce. Less than 10% of cases make it beyond this point. Why? It's all about their personal desire to review a case or not. They should review every case with questionable rulings. In this case their were several. End game - no justice at any level in Minnesota. Under the guise of absolute immunity, your public officials are given the freedom to trample every right you have and you'll have to take it. Voters need to think twice before blindly voting for the incumbents. They are part of the problem.
ReplyDeleteGood for you Thomson Township, John Gulland, Jeffrey Juntunen, and Duane Grace for your ability to throw out all of your required ministerial and operational duties, as well as your morals and ethics, and getting away with it. I know I'm only one of many citizens you have trampled. I pray that others will bring the same fight to your front steps and stop you from your continued unconstitutional actions. What happened to personal integrity? Immunity from prosecution isn't immunity from judgment from the true Higher Authority - God.
ReplyDelete